Garmin Venu 2 vs Garmin Forerunner 235

Great activity tracking
Long battery life
Customizable watch faces and data tracking features
Precision GPS and heart rate monitor
Comfortable design
Great accuracy and ease of use while running
Lightweight and reliable
GPS + GLONASS, audio, vibration motor, accelerometer, and 5ATM water resistance
8-hour battery life with GPS + Heart Rate - BlueTooth use
Can be used for swimming
Not compatible with Google Assistant
Occasional syncing issues
Inaccurate tracking of floors climbed and sleep
Not ifications cannot be turned off
Bluetooth issues reported by some users
Occasional heart rate monitoring problems

Verdict

Overall, the Garmin Venu 2 receives positive reviews for its strong activity tracking, long battery life, and comfortable design. Users appreciate the precision of the GPS and heart rate monitor, as well as the customizable watch faces and data tracking features. However, some users note occasional syncing issues and inaccuracies in tracking floors climbed and sleep. The lack of Google Assistant and integration with common cardio equipment are also mentioned as drawbacks. Despite these minor issues, the Garmin Venu 2 is generally recommended for those looking for a reliable and feature-rich smartwatch.

Verdict

The Garmin Forerunner 235 is a reliable and lightweight running watch that offers GPS + GLONASS, audio, vibration motor, accelerometer, and 5ATM water resistance. It has an 8-hour battery life with GPS + Heart Rate - BlueTooth use. Many users appreciate its accuracy and ease of use while running. However, some users have experienced Bluetooth issues and occasional heart rate monitoring problems.

Reviews by Topic

Our analysis shows how reviewers feel about different topics. Please note these are not full reviews.

QUICK QUESTION!

Got an opinion on a product you've used?
If so, we want to hear from you! Write an authentic longevity review about the product and share your experience with our community. You'll have the chance to win a $100 gift card.