Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

here the Canon 24-70 f 2.8 to me This is definitely the one lens to rule them all for so many reasons and I'm going to tell you why in a second hang o...

5 out of 50 in our highly recommended rating. The final word, as bitter of a pill $2,299 is to swallow, in my opinion, the Canon 24-70 Mark II is wort...

So overall, this is a massive update over the already legendary lens, that makes it easy to recommend for professionals looking for even better shots....

I was hoping for a little better from Canon's best professional lens. Some really good news though is that the lens has very nice quality bokeh. The w...

How about a used EF 24-105mm f/4L?

Barring that, I'd consider the EF 24-70mm f/4 USM as you suggested.

i am comparing this lens to the one with the identical specs from Nikon. The Canon lens has almost (but not quite) the same optical performance, but the manufacturing quality is worse. The Canon lens has a plastic feel with some mechanical "play" whereas the Nikon one feels solid. I am now comparing...

Some telephoto options if you don’t want to spend big on a 70-200 f/2.8 but get that telephoto bokeh look:

* Canon 100mm f/2 USM: $250-350 used

* Canon 135mm f/2L USM: $600-800 used ($1k new)

* Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM: $450-650 used

I purchased this product a little over a year ago for my small business. It is worth the investment! The picture quality is great and my pictures come out amazing! However, I just realized that this lens is supposed to comes with a lens hood. The 'Lens Hood EW-88C' was missing from the Canon box! So...

The biggest difference for me is the autofocus. There's a massive difference in hitrate when using AF-C. The Tamron routinely used to lose my subject and although it does acquire focus back quite often and I do get a reasonable hitrate, the Canon was miles ahead and pretty much perfect in terms of AF.

This one product is "wish I had a do over". Must use tripod or brace it well. Sluggish auto focus. For the price, recommend another product. Great paper weight.