Garmin Forerunner 645 vs Garmin Venu 2

Great for tracking progress and improving fitness
Long battery life
Feature-rich
Works with many websites and tools
Garmin Connect app provides health and running statistics for motivation
Great activity tracking
Long battery life
Customizable watch faces and data tracking features
Precision GPS and heart rate monitor
Comfortable design
Not waterproof
GPS data recording may become unreliable after extended use
Expensive
Not compatible with Google Assistant
Occasional syncing issues
Inaccurate tracking of floors climbed and sleep

Verdict

The Garmin Forerunner 645 is a great running watch for those looking to track their progress and improve their fitness. It has a long battery life, is feature-rich, and works with many websites and tools. The Garmin Connect app also provides users with health and running statistics that can be used as motivation. However, some users have experienced issues with GPS data recording after extended use.

Verdict

Overall, the Garmin Venu 2 receives positive reviews for its strong activity tracking, long battery life, and comfortable design. Users appreciate the precision of the GPS and heart rate monitor, as well as the customizable watch faces and data tracking features. However, some users note occasional syncing issues and inaccuracies in tracking floors climbed and sleep. The lack of Google Assistant and integration with common cardio equipment are also mentioned as drawbacks. Despite these minor issues, the Garmin Venu 2 is generally recommended for those looking for a reliable and feature-rich smartwatch.

QUICK QUESTION!

Got an opinion on a product you've used?
If so, we want to hear from you! Write an authentic longevity review about the product and share your experience with our community. You'll have the chance to win a $100 gift card.