Nikon D3000

My new camera hope you hope you found that interesting um, let's smell the camera, because I didn't smell the camera yet smells like fortune cookies, ...

So all in all, the D 3000 is ideal for beginners something used buying their very first dears alarm, but while it can delight these users, it can also...

The D3000 is arguably Nikon’s worst camera ever. Even so, it was $600 new _twelve_ years ago, so $100 today is still a ripoff. On top of that, it is not capable of video.

Pass on the D3000 unless it’s free.

This is probably not the right camera for someone who is an uber-photography hobyist. This is the right camera for someone who enjoys photography and wants to step up from a quality point and shoot digital pocket camera. I wanted an SLR because I wanted to improve the photos I was taking of my 18 mo...

The difference in image quality is small or non- existent, but the 3000 series is really lacking in controls and sturdy construction. This is important if you're shooting fast at events, but the D3000 series is fine for a studio shooter- if it is not too small for your hand. The D5600 would be a great compromise.

Hey potential buyers! I recently upgraded to the d3000 as my first DSLR. Earlier this year, when we were preparing for our first baby, my husband convinced me to purchase one of the Nikon point-and-shoot super-zoom cameras to save money (he said DSLRs are too difficult to use, anyway). After using t...

I'm surprised you can't get SD cards for the D3000. Look for the slower, smaller, and cheaper ones and you should be able to.get what you need. Anything up to, and including, a 32GB SDHC will be fine, although you won't get the fastest read and write speeds they can offer.

Excellent camera for the price and features. I'm not going to tell and compare all those technical details. I need a DSLR camera to take a good picture of my 6 months old kid. She moves a lot. Almost every picture has fuzz/blur in it. As far as DLSR cameras goes, it's pretty much between Cannon or N...

The D3000 is easily a 12 year old camera that may have been $400 brand new in 2009. It is true that you can learn on something at this level (I learned on its predecessor the D40) but please don't pay over $150 for it WITH the kit lens included. If you want Sony, Canon, Nikon etc, I would try them out from friends or camera shops and go from there. Even if its used, each brand has their way of doing things that you may like or not.

This has been a great camera that is fun to use. I upgraded from a coolpix and I wouldn't ever go back for taking quality pictures on my own time. I'm not much of a camera junky and I couldn't tell you megapixels and brand comparisons. I'm simply someone who wants to take better pictures and really ...