Canon RF 100-500mm

And so you know there are a few compromises here that you know maybe mar what the lens could have been but at the end of the day it is a lens that I a...

It actually works better than my 600mm version 2 EF prime lens and the camera and lens even work well with the extenders when it comes to autofocusing...

The optical stabilization inside seems a little bit sloppy when the lens isn't actually connected to the body or powered on. It's not uncommon to hear...

4 extender and I still got this really nice sharpness in detail so that impressed me and in good light this lens really delivers quite well with the e...

R6 and RF 100-500mm f4.5-7.1 L IS USM, or the RF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS USM if the subjects are large or I just need the extra light.

I carry my R5 with the 100-500 on a shoulder sling connected to the foot of the lens not the camera body for better balance carrying it. I was adjusting the foot knob to loosen it to turn the camera body bottom toward my leg as I've done a thousand times with my100-400 when the CAMERA & LENS DROPPED...

Hi everyone,. I recently rented the RF 100-500mm for a trip and absolutely loved it.

The image quality is great even at high ISOs, the IS and AF are great, too. However, it doesn't feel as high quality as other L lenses (for example compared to an EF 70-200). One of the areas that feels really apparent is the tripod collar. Even if you tighten it, it gets loose over time and after a...

the **Canon RF 85mm f1.2 L** is pretty good. the downside is it lacks image stabilization.

but if you got budget for lenses, **the Canon RF 100-500mm f4.5-7.1 L IS USM** has good reviews and the stabilization is awesome!

I really like the lens but sometimes I need to turn on & off the camera for it to be able to achieve focus. It literally gets stuck out of focus.