Canon EOS 6D vs Canon EOS Rebel T7 / EOS 2000D

I think that it's very, very good for both sands, that focusing issue with stills. I wouldn't use autofocus when it comes to shooting video, because i...

Photos look sharp and detailed at moderately high ISO levels, though its RAW noise handling capability is just passable, in part due to its APS-C sensor, which can handle some low-light situations but introduces visual noise at higher ISOs. While it doesn't have any in-body image stabilization, the camera does a great job stabilizing photos when shooting at slower shutter speeds without a tripod when you have its kit lens attached.

Its autofocus system also performs decently well when tracking moving subjects, though it's not as impressive as higher-end models.

Unfortunately, it has a very limited autofocus system that struggles to track moving human subjects, although it performs better with objects moving towards or away from the camera in a more linear way. The camera is also limited to a 3 fps max burst rate, so it's not the best option for capturing fast-moving subjects. Still, for the price, this makes for a solid beginner DSLR camera, and though it lacks the advanced features of higher-end models, it's still capable of taking great photos.

I don't do video at all. My concern is the 6D doesn't cost much more than the 70D did when I got it, so I'm worried it's not much better? But I'm also not sure if the 5D is worth twice the price..

If you find a basic video and wireless connectivity into a very affordable package, it'll appeal greatly to those starting out in photography, althoug...