Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs Canon EOS Rebel SL3

Canon, size shows a DSLR, lens shows it's probably a Full frame model. Make-up YouTuber need it to be good at autofocus.

Love the fact that I can use legacy Canon lenses or the newest, as my budget allows. I got the 18-55 STM kit lens and it is a fine starter lens, especially for video (wide angle since the camera crops, especially with 4K video), it's silent, fast and relatively accurate. I also got a "nifty fifty" prime Canon 50mm lens that is Super for portraits and just to walk around with taking photos. I also got a Canon EF-S 55-250mm STM lens for excellent shots of RC planes in the air far away

My quick review as a professional photographer is that the 5DM4 worked mostly as expected but I can't give it 4 or 5 stars because I encountered several substantial problem during the trip where I snapped about 8000 photos. The four are as follows: #1 Consistent blow-outs in Evaluative mode (center dot with circle around it). For example, if taking a picture of a bird in bright sunlight where the background is darker (such as the trees lining a river) consistently blew-out the highlights on the bird. This occurred EVEN WITH highlight tone priority turned on

Let's talk a little bit about the processor and with the SL 3 Canon opted for the newer digit 8 processor. This is one of the upgrades from the SL 2, ...

Of course the ISOs are going to be slightly different but if all you are looking for is 1080 video straight out to an Atomos, 5D Mark III might be a b...

For the type of video you're doing, I prefer the Canon. The autofocus is smoother and you can scrub footage to review it, which is really important. The Sony has weird old VCR-style controls to review footage and it means sometimes I don't catch problems I need to know about soon enough to refilm.

That 24-105 is a good lens, but it's not going to be worth upgrading to a 5D IV to use it. The 5D Mark IV is a pro grade camera that's very big and bulky. Really not a camera for a hobbyist, because you're going to be paying for features that you don't need like dual card slots and weather sealing. I'd also steer clear of the 6D II as well

Not even close. But keep the cost in mind. Keep the weight in mind. Mostly, keep that fabulous Digic 8 processor in mind

This could just be my units and maybe a bit of dust on the Mark III, but using the same lenses, I find the Mark IV viewfinder a joy to use, much like the Mark III's, and even a shade brighter! The new Dual Pixel AF works as advertised, and is much faster than the Mark III at face detection and toggling between different subjects - a big improvement here. The back review LCD is also a touchscreen now, which allows for your standard panning of shots as well as pinch-and-zoom. Although many shooters will still opt for the familiar mechanical buttons, as a hobbyist that shares the camera for others to shoot as well as reviews them on the spot with many moms with Android/iPhones, it's so much easier now to have them use the touchscreen to flip from photo to photo, and to zoom in and out to see themselves and whether the shot is worth keeping ;) In terms of photo quality, the highlight is the improved dynamic range of the new 30MP sensor. Although improved from the Mark II to the Mark III, I see a marked improvement for the Mark IV

Hi I'm Gordon from Camera Labs and this is my review of the Canon EOS 250D or Rebel SL3 as it's known in North America. The 250D as I'll refer to it i...

However, it's a big DSLR and it gets heavy fast and it takes up a ton of space in your bag. For travel, a smaller, lighter, mirrorless camera like the...

I just want to kind of talk to you about what you need to make a big overview video on Wednesday. I just want to kind of talk about like what the came...