Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs Canon EOS 90D

Canon, size shows a DSLR, lens shows it's probably a Full frame model. Make-up YouTuber need it to be good at autofocus.

Honestly, I feel like full frame is overvalued, especially for non-professionals who don't need the best of the best to make max profit. That being said, they are rather close, in size as well as in price. I'd usually go with MILC over DSLR, but that's a personal thing and your opinion or feelings might differ, but I assume you don't have a preference, otherwise you'd not be asking the question. If you get FF lenses for better quality, then size doesn't matter, they'll be close

The full-frame sensor really changed what you could get in a prosumer little camera at that price range. Nothing else is like that. The 5d Mark Ii, th...

The 90 D offers you a very large buffer that you won't outrun unless you're shooting for over eight seconds. I had no problem shooting at ten frames, ...

My quick review as a professional photographer is that the 5DM4 worked mostly as expected but I can't give it 4 or 5 stars because I encountered several substantial problem during the trip where I snapped about 8000 photos. The four are as follows: #1 Consistent blow-outs in Evaluative mode (center dot with circle around it). For example, if taking a picture of a bird in bright sunlight where the background is darker (such as the trees lining a river) consistently blew-out the highlights on the bird. This occurred EVEN WITH highlight tone priority turned on

That said, its high ISO performance isn't quite as competitive as some mirrorless alternatives. It's still okay in dim lighting, but you're better off shooting at moderate and lower ISOs to avoid introducing too much digital noise. It's also fairly heavy and bulky, making it less suitable for travel or for those who simply prefer a lighter kit when on the go. Still, if you're interested in a DSLR, this is one of the best crop-sensor DSLRs that we've tested

Of course the ISOs are going to be slightly different but if all you are looking for is 1080 video straight out to an Atomos, 5D Mark III might be a b...

What is this canon eos 90 d trying to be? Is it an upgraded 80 d new sensor and you know great video capabilities? Yes, absolutely is it an m6 Mark 2 ...

That 24-105 is a good lens, but it's not going to be worth upgrading to a 5D IV to use it. The 5D Mark IV is a pro grade camera that's very big and bulky. Really not a camera for a hobbyist, because you're going to be paying for features that you don't need like dual card slots and weather sealing. I'd also steer clear of the 6D II as well

That's up, but just oh my god, that's not bad right! That's a wiener. I can barely get one 125th there. I was looking you're getting some pretty solid...

This could just be my units and maybe a bit of dust on the Mark III, but using the same lenses, I find the Mark IV viewfinder a joy to use, much like the Mark III's, and even a shade brighter! The new Dual Pixel AF works as advertised, and is much faster than the Mark III at face detection and toggling between different subjects - a big improvement here. The back review LCD is also a touchscreen now, which allows for your standard panning of shots as well as pinch-and-zoom. Although many shooters will still opt for the familiar mechanical buttons, as a hobbyist that shares the camera for others to shoot as well as reviews them on the spot with many moms with Android/iPhones, it's so much easier now to have them use the touchscreen to flip from photo to photo, and to zoom in and out to see themselves and whether the shot is worth keeping ;) In terms of photo quality, the highlight is the improved dynamic range of the new 30MP sensor. Although improved from the Mark II to the Mark III, I see a marked improvement for the Mark IV

5MP sensor with support for 4K video, improved autofocus both in the viewfinder and Live View, and some slight ergonomic improvements. The upgrades aren't significant enough for us to consider it the actual replacement for the EOS 7D Mark II, which is still on sale with a more rugged build and better-feeling controls, but the 90D is an attractive camera for customers happy with the features and feel of the 80D and earlier models. We recommend that buyers looking at SLRs also consider mirrorless options, but if you absolutely prefer an optical viewfinder, the 90D doesn't disappoint.

The grip allows you to use two batteries to power the camera. CIPA rates a fully charged battery to net 900 shots via the viewfinder and 300 using the rear LCD. Those numbers don't always translate into real-world results, but are useful for comparing against similar cameras as the testing methodology is consistent from model to model. The battery life isn't quite as good as the 5D Mark III when using the optical viewfinder (950 shots), but is better via Live View (200 shots)

You also move away from micro adjustments issues too. Battery life is ok, not great, offset by small batteries and much easier charging with USB-C.