Canon EOS 1300D Rebel T6 w/ EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II vs Canon EOS 90D

I love this camera but the lense is spaced out and foggy like the two peices of glass on it are coming unglued. Please send a new lense. Thanks.

Honestly, I feel like full frame is overvalued, especially for non-professionals who don't need the best of the best to make max profit. That being said, they are rather close, in size as well as in price. I'd usually go with MILC over DSLR, but that's a personal thing and your opinion or feelings might differ, but I assume you don't have a preference, otherwise you'd not be asking the question. If you get FF lenses for better quality, then size doesn't matter, they'll be close

I bought this camera to replace my Canon Rebel T2i that was water damaged irreparably. When choosing this model, I preferred the options of the T6 over the more expensive T6i. For example, I do not need stabilization because any lenses I have which may require it (mainly telephoto) incorporate that feature. I recommend any buyer carefully decide what features they'll actually use (not just what sounds good) before choosing between this model and the T6i

5MP sensor with support for 4K video, improved autofocus both in the viewfinder and Live View, and some slight ergonomic improvements. The upgrades aren't significant enough for us to consider it the actual replacement for the EOS 7D Mark II, which is still on sale with a more rugged build and better-feeling controls, but the 90D is an attractive camera for customers happy with the features and feel of the 80D and earlier models. We recommend that buyers looking at SLRs also consider mirrorless options, but if you absolutely prefer an optical viewfinder, the 90D doesn't disappoint.

In Live View mode it's pretty good in my "studio" but I can't comment on contrast and visibility outdoors. However, it is clear, seems to have a fine resolution and does the job. However, it isn't articulated like some people prefer so that may be a deal-breaker for you. For me, not so much

That said, its high ISO performance isn't quite as competitive as some mirrorless alternatives. It's still okay in dim lighting, but you're better off shooting at moderate and lower ISOs to avoid introducing too much digital noise. It's also fairly heavy and bulky, making it less suitable for travel or for those who simply prefer a lighter kit when on the go. Still, if you're interested in a DSLR, this is one of the best crop-sensor DSLRs that we've tested

Granted, autofocus did have some issues resolving under those light conditions, but it still managed to take good, sharp, pictures, despite being well outside of a "normal" use condition. The video will only record for a little over 12 minutes, which is unfortunate, but it IS a "Still" camera. The microphone is actually pretty decent. I've managed to use it for at least 2 hours at a time, taking over a hundred photos, all using the screen on the back and the autofocus, which says something about the battery life

You also move away from micro adjustments issues too. Battery life is ok, not great, offset by small batteries and much easier charging with USB-C.

Not great for beginners and not really any better than my iPhone. My interest is using it in full auto mode. My issues: • The autofocus doesn't work well half the time. • The flash is terrible - to me if you can tell a flash was used it's not natural and looks bad

What is this canon eos 90 d trying to be? Is it an upgraded 80 d new sensor and you know great video capabilities? Yes, absolutely is it an m6 Mark 2 ...

Best DSLR I've ever owned! Easy to use! Excellent for video production! Easy lens change out! PRO Stuff for a decent price! Would prefer a 3.5 mm mic port. Great for family portraits, weddings, EVERYTHING!

The 90 D offers you a very large buffer that you won't outrun unless you're shooting for over eight seconds. I had no problem shooting at ten frames, ...