Vanguard Alta Pro 2+ 263AB100 vs Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm

Sleek Look,, great weight, and a fabulous tripod all the way around. Now The carbon fiber does not come with a head. You choose a head that goes with ...

I like a heavy lens. The Tamron is slightly lighter, and the focus rings could be smoother. The Nikon wins in build quality and ease of focusing/zooming. Overall, the Nikon 70-200mm f/2

This was my second Vanguard camera tripod. My first, the very tough Auctus Plus 283AT was my everyday tripod (most architecture) for almost ten years. I still use it but I wanted to have a lighter tripod last year and settled on this one. It seemed a good buy and worked acceptably

I posted a few sample image that I took with this news lens. Regarding the weight, you know what you are getting into, so, don't complain. Don't buy a Porsche and expect to put regular unleaded gas. Bottom line, you only live once, get it and you will be very happy with this lens

Took some 30 sec exposures alongside a busy highway with 18 wheel tractor trailers going by at 65 mph and still got tack sharp images. Their passing was enough to blow my hair around, but didn't budge the camera. It's not exactly what I would call lightweight, but I've gladly carried it for several miles into the swamps of Florida to get the shot I was after. Very impressed with this piece of equipment

Underperforming zooms often drop in quality at the telephoto extreme. That is not the case with the 70-200mm f/2.8E. It notches 3,218 lines at 200mm f/2

Don’t buy this tripod if you use a large telephoto or zoom lens ie., Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6. I understand the product isn’t “heavy duty”, the ball will nod hold larger lenses

Some people say over at Nikon that the reason they did that is, they got a lot of feedback that people said they wanted the focus ring inside and the ...