SK Hynix Gold P31 vs Samsung SSD 980

Even GTA V loads quicker! I am running a 32" at 1440P. I am glad that when I was picking up the Samsung (before I placed this order!), I returned it right then and there, as I saved about $55 and GAINED a whole lot in performance. SK said that they would revise their website and provide a toolbox (they should have had one before launch - for such a large company), but I am HAPPY that I made this purchase and I trusted this brand because they actually design, MANUFACTURE and SUPPLY the memory to other brands, so of course they know what they are doing more than the other brands! I give this the same praise as the pro reviewers do! The performance and the price make this a no contest for other brands! You get the performance (or better) of other brands TOP (most expensive) drives or better - for only $135! Again, SK Hynix MAKES the memory, so that is why they can bring such high quality for so low! If you do not know companies that are involved with the sources of PC components - just trust us and get this!

The Samsung SSD 980 joins the ranks of midrange PCIe 3.0 drives like the ADATA SX8200 Pro (a continued favorite around PC Labs, despite the company's recently reported issues with component swapping) and the $149 Crucial P5 at the 13 to 15 cents per gigabyte mark for the 1TB size variant. (The Samsung comes in at 13 cents per gigabyte at its launch list price of $129.99; the 250GB and 500GB versions are a bit costlier per gig, especially the smallest-capacity drive

SK hynix Gold P31 1TB PCIe NVMe Gen3 M.2 2280 Internal SSD | Up to 3500MB/S | Compact M.2 SSD Form Factor SK hynix SSD | Internal Solid State Drive with 128-Layer NAND Flash.

Easy, breezy. I have a huge top end laptop meant for video editing on the go. If any hardware has extra heatsinks, thicker chips, etc, it will not fit. 980 PRO slipped in without issue or modification to the housing of the drives

The system tested, took 12 seconds to boot Windows 10 counting from the time I pressed the power button. I have tested several SSDs, and that is the fastest the system will boot. I have noticed that any drive with read speeds of 1800 MB/s or better will accomplish the task. The SK hynix P31 500GB surpassed the advertised write speeds of 3100 MB/s reaching 3183

99 for 1TB), launched last week, gives the SSD 980 some healthy competition, the SSD 980 has come right in and stolen the first-place performance and value crown for PCI Express 3.0 drives back for Samsung once again.

When I plugged my new Hynix into the slot and powered up my computer it was absolutely flawless, every app, every file, every preference, ever login, they were all exactly when they used to be only now I had a much larger, faster and brand-new main drive.

The container came with both USB-A and C cables. About getting that container: Delivery would have been 2+ days for an acceptable quality device ordered here, despite multiple options. I was able to instead get an equal value, store brand item the same day from a local BB. That was a rare fortunate outcome

Don't buy this for a PS5. It doesn't meet the minimum requirements. It may work well in a PC or laptop. The search engine for Amazon needs a lot of work

This review is for Samsung 980 Pro 2TB NVMe SSD. I have a pair of these in a RAID 1 Mirror setup. I have actually used them in two different systems as such. I have been very happy with the compatibility, ease of setup, and performance

Installed this 2TB as system drive in a Dell G7 17 laptop, replacing the original Hynix PC611 1TB NVMe, to get some more storage space (a WD SN550 2TB is already installed in the second M.2 slot). This 2TB runs a bit faster than the old 1TB Hynix but it also runs hotter. The old Hynix would idle at around 30C but the new 2TB idles around 40C

Now for 3070 do not buy it , not worth really , 3070 has ddr6 memory while 3070ti 3080 and 3080ti have ddr6x memorey this will play a big patt in future proofong ur gpu so go for 3070 ti not 3070 ,they are the same price tbh.

" "A driver is installed that causes stability problems on this version of Windows and it will be disabled. Check..

OST file. After a bit of Googling around, I came to the conclusion that it relies on Windows Shadow Copy / Volume Shadow Copy Service which Microsoft has decided should not be backing up .OST file (although allegedly the registry subkey OutlookOST controls this behavior), so after I opened Outlook, my emails were not there, and it took a few hours for my mailbox to resynchronize with my ISP (we're talking multiple gigs of emails accumulated over a decade) and I lost my Outlook rules. I wished I had been made aware of this upfront