Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE

Although this photo i took doesn't have as much detail compared to the ultra's photo. You also might be wondering how the galaxy s22 ultra stands up a...

That means the s21 fe is much better for taking closely zoomed photos. You can zoom up to 30 times digitally with the s21 fe, and that includes a thre...

Just go with Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra for the best bet since you got the budget. It fits all your requirements but without headphone jack.

I'm willing to return the faulty phone and get a replacement but wanted my same Black Friday price. Amazon would not give that to me. The only option is a refund. They didn't seem particularly eager to make it work

But unfortunately, the new Xclipse GPU doesn't really look like a finished product yet, so gamers (still) have to be content with reduced details and low frame rates in a high-end smartphone. While Samsung will probably still bring some improvements in this regard via updates, considering the premium price, users should surely be able to expect a more mature product here.

Screen on time has continued to improve from the barely 5 hours before to 6.5-7 with the same usage now. As such, I have added one star to my review. I still encounter ghost touches and I am not sure how much of an improvement the case change has been to signal strength, but this has gone from an underwhelming experience to a solid option for those that can get a good deal on it

In everyday use, the S22 Ultra performs like the $1,200 flagship that it is. Jumping from app to app is quick, graphics-intensive games run smoothly, and everything looks buttery smooth on the 120Hz display. In my testing, it was a very rare occurrence to see the screen stutter as I scrolled, and in the cases where it did, I don’t think it was the phone’s fault (I’m looking at you, Twitter for Android).

My old Galaxy S7 looked practically primitive when set against the S20 FE. And so, I decided to give a midrange phone a try. At first glance, the S20 FE seemed too good to be true. The screen, while not 4K, still looks great with the 120Hz refresh rate enabled

If you get the best tablet or phone there is, there is no need to get another for at least 3-5 years, then software might become outdated. Everything released in between is just noise to me. Even a $600 phone can do exactly what a $1200-1500 s22 ultra or whatever can do. Tablets might be a different story, but you just have to reset your brain that all these things aren't necessary

The Snapdragon (SD) 888 was know to run hot, and the SD 8 Gen 1 is even hotter. Most people do not need that type of bleeding edge of performance. This phone actually runs quite cool. Most people don't want their phone to turn into a frying pan in order to squeak out an extra bit of performance, and if they do, then they will get a proper gaming phone like an Asus ROG

Battery – I don’t have a 5G contract, so I disabled 5G, set brightness to adaptive and so far I am getting 7 to 8 hours plus of screen on time, so no complaints. Charging does seem a little slower, but to 50/60% it’s about the same.

Performance wise it actually holds up, love the size, finger print at the back, but the battery is horrendous. Had it for around 4 and a half years, so I would like to get something that might possibly hold up similarly for around 4 years. My budget is around 400 euros and I could get a Samsung galaxy S21 FE for around 380 or the Pixel 6 for around the same price. Was thinking about the Oneplus 9 pro which I could get for around 440, but that one might be too big for me considering what I'm used to

You might notice, though, that the s92 ultra is about 21 grams or 0.74 ounces heavier the phone weighs more than the pixel 6 pro too, although the iph...

The s21 fv lands squarely between the 6.2 inch s21 and 6.7 inch s21, plus around back. The s21 fe still features samsung's contour cut design, but ins...