Ricoh GR III vs Canon EOS 90D

Again, great picture quality and compactness is awesome so I really want to like and even love this camera but the heating issue maybe a dealbreaker ☹️

That said, its high ISO performance isn't quite as competitive as some mirrorless alternatives. It's still okay in dim lighting, but you're better off shooting at moderate and lower ISOs to avoid introducing too much digital noise. It's also fairly heavy and bulky, making it less suitable for travel or for those who simply prefer a lighter kit when on the go. Still, if you're interested in a DSLR, this is one of the best crop-sensor DSLRs that we've tested

Sharpness on (2), Contrast and Saturation on "2", Touchscreen is "off", and Focus is on "center".

5MP sensor with support for 4K video, improved autofocus both in the viewfinder and Live View, and some slight ergonomic improvements. The upgrades aren't significant enough for us to consider it the actual replacement for the EOS 7D Mark II, which is still on sale with a more rugged build and better-feeling controls, but the 90D is an attractive camera for customers happy with the features and feel of the 80D and earlier models. We recommend that buyers looking at SLRs also consider mirrorless options, but if you absolutely prefer an optical viewfinder, the 90D doesn't disappoint.

So if I had to give you an impression overall of the image quality on the gr3, I think you're gon na really enjoy it. I mean the lens is super sharp, ...

Honestly, I feel like full frame is overvalued, especially for non-professionals who don't need the best of the best to make max profit. That being said, they are rather close, in size as well as in price. I'd usually go with MILC over DSLR, but that's a personal thing and your opinion or feelings might differ, but I assume you don't have a preference, otherwise you'd not be asking the question. If you get FF lenses for better quality, then size doesn't matter, they'll be close

Fun little camera. Autofocus is not so great in low light but snap focus is always reliable. Low light performance for image quality is pretty bad at higher ISOs. In my opinion, this is a daytime camera due to no built in flash and limited low light performance

What is this canon eos 90 d trying to be? Is it an upgraded 80 d new sensor and you know great video capabilities? Yes, absolutely is it an m6 Mark 2 ...

It's NOT dainty, it's 'meaty' and heavy in it's own right. A big man will not feel weird with this in his hands - big guys know what I'm talking about.

That's up, but just oh my god, that's not bad right! That's a wiener. I can barely get one 125th there. I was looking you're getting some pretty solid...

I am going on a trip later this week and planning to take the GR iii and the RX 100 VI for zooming in daylight, and leaving my full frame Sonys at home.

The 90D with a 300mm lens is perfect for hand held wildlife thanks to the crop factor the 300mm becomes a 480mm which gives me a ton of reach in a kit that cost less than $1800 and isn't a huge 500mm on a full frame where the animals will be gone by the time I get the tripod setup.

Battery life is sure not great, but you can eke a lot more than the rated 200 shots out of it by switching the camera off when you're not taking photos. AF is the big bugbear. Fortunately, it’s not as bad as they say. It's very similar to the GR II, except noticeably faster in good light, and possibly worse in very bad light

You also move away from micro adjustments issues too. Battery life is ok, not great, offset by small batteries and much easier charging with USB-C.

Sadly, this doesn't support 4K video recording, although we do at least get Full HD capture to 60p.

The 90 D offers you a very large buffer that you won't outrun unless you're shooting for over eight seconds. I had no problem shooting at ten frames, ...