Garmin Venu 2 vs Garmin Vivoactive Hr

Great activity tracking
Long battery life
Customizable watch faces and data tracking features
Precision GPS and heart rate monitor
Comfortable design
Great for casual walkers, runners, hikers, golfers, swimmers, and bikers
Waterproof
Long battery life
Heart rate monitor
Altimeter for stair climbing
Not compatible with Google Assistant
Occasional syncing issues
Inaccurate tracking of floors climbed and sleep
Not the best option for dedicated runners and triathletes
May not have all the features of more expensive models
No built-in GPS

Verdict

Overall, the Garmin Venu 2 receives positive reviews for its strong activity tracking, long battery life, and comfortable design. Users appreciate the precision of the GPS and heart rate monitor, as well as the customizable watch faces and data tracking features. However, some users note occasional syncing issues and inaccuracies in tracking floors climbed and sleep. The lack of Google Assistant and integration with common cardio equipment are also mentioned as drawbacks. Despite these minor issues, the Garmin Venu 2 is generally recommended for those looking for a reliable and feature-rich smartwatch.

Verdict

The Garmin Vivoactive HR is a great choice for casual walkers, runners, hikers, golfers, swimmers, and bikers. It is waterproof and has a long battery life. It also features a heart rate monitor and altimeter for stair climbing. However, it may not be the best option for dedicated runners and triathletes as it lacks some more advanced features.

Reviews by Topic

Our analysis shows how reviewers feel about different topics. Please note these are not full reviews.

QUICK QUESTION!

Got an opinion on a product you've used?
If so, we want to hear from you! Write an authentic longevity review about the product and share your experience with our community. You'll have the chance to win a $100 gift card.