Garmin Venu 2 vs Garmin Vivoactive 3

Great activity tracking
Long battery life
Customizable watch faces and data tracking features
Precision GPS and heart rate monitor
Comfortable design
Great battery life
Attractive and durable design
Accurate heart rate monitoring
Versatile and customizable for tracking fitness and daily activities
Not compatible with Google Assistant
Occasional syncing issues
Inaccurate tracking of floors climbed and sleep
Not as user-friendly as some other smartwatches
Display could be better
Some users have reported issues with water sensitivity

Verdict

Overall, the Garmin Venu 2 receives positive reviews for its strong activity tracking, long battery life, and comfortable design. Users appreciate the precision of the GPS and heart rate monitor, as well as the customizable watch faces and data tracking features. However, some users note occasional syncing issues and inaccuracies in tracking floors climbed and sleep. The lack of Google Assistant and integration with common cardio equipment are also mentioned as drawbacks. Despite these minor issues, the Garmin Venu 2 is generally recommended for those looking for a reliable and feature-rich smartwatch.

Verdict

The Garmin Vivoactive 3 is a highly recommended wearable device that strikes a balance between fitness tracker and smartwatch functionality. It has a durable and attractive design, accurate heart rate monitoring, and good battery life. However, some users have reported issues with the display, user-friendliness, and water sensitivity. It is a good option for those who want a versatile and customizable device for tracking their fitness and daily activities.

Reviews by Topic

Our analysis shows how reviewers feel about different topics. Please note these are not full reviews.

QUICK QUESTION!

Got an opinion on a product you've used?
If so, we want to hear from you! Write an authentic longevity review about the product and share your experience with our community. You'll have the chance to win a $100 gift card.