Coleman Classic Propane Stove vs Fire Maple Blade 2

Still touchy on low heat settings but quite usable. I would give Coleman's customer service and warranty process 5+ Stars, the camp stove a 3 Star Rating. ORIGINAL REVIEW: I started purchase of Coleman products in 1981, I was always delighted with the functionality, quality, and value of the products (2 burner White Gas camp stove & Lantern). They functioned as one would expect, maybe not the easiest to clean after a "boil over" but worked great delivering both high and very low heat as required

Most importantly for me this stove allows very fine attenuation of the flame. That allows me to simmer in pot. If you are rehydrating meals the full flame boils water very quickly. The stove is rated at 9500 BTU

So another good feature about this is the burner and the grate is pretty close. I Have a medium-size pan on here right now and this is kind of a small...

it has all the features that all 4 season remotes have but its only 135ish gr vs the 180ish gr on the vega.

For the price not bad and here we are we're gonna eat our meals, our meal and enjoy. have a great time! [music] All right guys Thanks so much for watc...

The price isn't terrible but for this brand and with a need for redesign, it should be closer to $50.

Fix is below: "Initially, the hose did not let gas from my 20 lb propane tank reach the burners on my Coleman NXT 200 grill; while a 1 lb disposable canister worked fine. It was puzzling why the canister fit fine but the hose and big tank did not. However, after digging around for answers on the web, it turned out the remedy actually was to modify the grill fitting to better fit the hose, i.e

But the cons being? you know, because there's more material, they're obviously a little bit bigger. You know I've got a pocket rocket too, which is a ...

Stove is fairly heavy and bulky, but packs okay because of the lid. Just pack a couple of pot holders inside to stop it from rattling. Definitely not a backpacking stove, though.

Everybody compares this to the BRS-3000T so I'll start there. At first glance they look extremely similar and the BRS is a few grams lighter coming in just under an ounce. The Fire Maple is actually the original and if you pay attention to the pictures you'll notices some brass and steel parts in there. That accounts for the weight difference and also the quality difference between the two stoves