Casio F91W-1 vs Casio SGW300HB

) The original just crapped out after, what, forty-some years. Will this new model last that long? Doubtful..

It's not a good choice if the main thing you want to be able to do is glance at it very quickly and see instantly what time it is. That said, the buttons work well and it looks like it can take some abuse. I've had lousy luck getting Timex watches to last, so if this proves to be durable, it's probably worth it even though I paid extra for features I'll never use.

The watch itself is what he wanted. Not too big and thin. The Casio watch he has been wearing for years has unfortunately finally been discontinued. The band on this is not for a man with a large wrist

(in other words, you dont feel like Ben 10 ..lol) 3. The cost which is just less than half of the other models

Mere quantity and affordability, however, don’t fully explain its success: design, functionality, and ergonomics also contributed to the F-91W becoming the representative of a “cheap digital watch” and cultural icon. It has been the subject of art, and according to the BBC, co-founder of London’s Design Museum and design critic Stephen Bayley calls it a “modest masterpiece.” The number-one selling watch on Amazon, thousands of users rate the F-91W 4.5 out of five stars

This watch is smaller than the 50 mm I expected but the quality look and feel makes up for it. I presume they measured side to side including the sensor on the left side of the crown. Numbers are smaller than expected in the face of the timepiece but clean and clear. Strap is 100% great