Casio Digital GWM5610-1 Men's Watch vs Casio SGW300HB

this is less likely to get snagged, caught up, etc. The time sync works well, but I am close to Ft Collins. Bought as a tough, no maintenance beater for edc. It is generally good for that purpose, but there are other options in that space

It's not a good choice if the main thing you want to be able to do is glance at it very quickly and see instantly what time it is. That said, the buttons work well and it looks like it can take some abuse. I've had lousy luck getting Timex watches to last, so if this proves to be durable, it's probably worth it even though I paid extra for features I'll never use.

The manual shows how to manually connect, so I did so. Come to find out, the mountains of NC are too much for the signal to reach me from Colorado. So, one of the two features that makes the watch cost twice as much as the simple $45 version, wasn't even working for me. I've decided to return it and look for a large case watch that fits by big ole' wrist

(in other words, you dont feel like Ben 10 ..lol) 3. The cost which is just less than half of the other models

What prompted me to buy the watch was to get a simplistic, old school design with some modern touches of solar, auto light, and atomic time keeping. After having the watch a month, I am satisfied with the old school part, but the modern touches, are really worthless. - I live in Oregon, the atomic clock has self-set a total of 4 times without me doing a manual set. - The light only stays on for 1

This watch is smaller than the 50 mm I expected but the quality look and feel makes up for it. I presume they measured side to side including the sensor on the left side of the crown. Numbers are smaller than expected in the face of the timepiece but clean and clear. Strap is 100% great