Canon EOS Rebel T7 / EOS 2000D vs Canon EOS Rebel SL3

Unfortunately, it has a very limited autofocus system that struggles to track moving human subjects, although it performs better with objects moving towards or away from the camera in a more linear way. The camera is also limited to a 3 fps max burst rate, so it's not the best option for capturing fast-moving subjects. Still, for the price, this makes for a solid beginner DSLR camera, and though it lacks the advanced features of higher-end models, it's still capable of taking great photos.

For the type of video you're doing, I prefer the Canon. The autofocus is smoother and you can scrub footage to review it, which is really important. The Sony has weird old VCR-style controls to review footage and it means sometimes I don't catch problems I need to know about soon enough to refilm.

Photos look sharp and detailed at moderately high ISO levels, though its RAW noise handling capability is just passable, in part due to its APS-C sensor, which can handle some low-light situations but introduces visual noise at higher ISOs. While it doesn't have any in-body image stabilization, the camera does a great job stabilizing photos when shooting at slower shutter speeds without a tripod when you have its kit lens attached.

Let's talk a little bit about the processor and with the SL 3 Canon opted for the newer digit 8 processor. This is one of the upgrades from the SL 2, ...