Canon EOS R6 vs Nikon D300

You can play with the sliders to see the befores and the afters and if you decide to pick them up right now they are on sale or if you want to get ski...

It might be better to get a D300s instead of a D300 because that'll give you video (not that its good in any way, but hey, its an option you'll have) and also supports dual SD/CF card slots -- useful for backups or RAW+JPEG modes.

No qualms about the camera picture quality. However, it is cheaply built. The on/off switch snapped off and I was just a couple of months past my 1 year warranty. It had minimal use

For those wanting exemplary image quality with much of what the D300 offers but for significantly less money: Canon offers the popularCanon EOS 40D 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) and Nikon now has attractive pricing for its popular D200, the fine camera that the D300 updated in late 2007Nikon D200 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) . It has also earned many loyal followers and has a very solid build

The eye auto focus is so magical and makes portrait photography that much more freeing to create. Camera features and handling - 10/10.

Calm now the D 300 may have a very detailed screen on the top. But if you press the info button, why are you taking a picture? You can actually displa...

If you have a big budget get the EOS R6 with an EF adapter. Sell all of the EF-S glass and invest in a quality wide to normal (or telephoto) zoom like a 24-105.

Seriously, for anyone who can't afford high-end f/1.4 primes (not counting the Nikkor 50/1.4G, which is about the same price), the Tamron 45mm is easily the next best thing in its focal length range. This is an unpopular opinion, but only because so few people have given the lens a chance

The thing i love about my r6 is just the color and the tones i get from. In other words, the pictures i get look the way i want it to look if you're l...

Also this machine requires good lenses to maximize it's potential; the 18-200 VR Nikkor that works so well on my D70S seems softer on the D300. Heavily recommended for: Those who have Nikon cameras and have maxxed out the possibilities with those machines and are looking for greater challenges. The D300 will support Nikkor lenses made since 1959 (although the ones made before 1977 may need a minor, inexpensive modification to fit on the D300). Not all older lenses, of course, support auto-focus

i own that lens and find it to be excellent bang for the buck.

After looking at some other commenters I would have to emphasize heavily on getting the cheapest camera possible for a good lens. The D7000 and D200 are both great candidates, but may be a bit too old. I would really push you towards the D7100 in most regards, but for price and build the D300 is hard to beat. Get yourself a D300, and a good FX lens

The articles posted the r6 is real. It's here. It's on the table. You got the top down we're gon na go through the features you already saw, some of t...

Button help lock button I'll zoom in ok button. Your multi selector life.you button info button. Your focus area got your job back front down as well ...

The lenses for Micro Four Thirds are relatively lightweight, so carrying my camera and lenses while hiking is a no-brainer for me. If I had a camera with a bigger sensor, like the Sony a7 IV or Canon EOS R6, I would have to compromise on something—be it versatility and usability, or the sharpness of the lens—to keep the pack weight as low. The sensor gets me all the performance I need for anything but edge cases which I work around easily enough, and the lenses I carry with me are all sharp and cover the range I need.

The weight and feel of the d300, even with the lens attached it is very comfortable. It's got a solid feel to it definitely feels good [, Music ] powe...