Audioengine B1 Bluetooth Music Receiver vs Korg microKorg

I think the build quality of the device is premium. The only thing that I think that isn't is the antenna, for whatever reason it doesn't seem like it...

A larger range of effects and a lowered price tag would have made the micro court overwhelmingly more appealing to someone like myself, but would any ...

On the flip side, I don't want to inadvertently downgrade to a worse option if the Marantz is already decent for audio. Also, I still need to deal with my TV audio..

Is it perfect? No, does it sound good, I would say: yes, I'm still not sure what I find more annoying the craft beer, drinking and avocado toasty, dev...

I have never heard a wireless signal sound so clean and authoritative in the bottom end without being muddy or losing its musicality. The B1 is extremely quite and I have not detected any background noise at all. Very impressive. As an experiment I decided to hook up the B1 to my Musical Fidelity V90 Dac to see if that made this already great sounding piece better

You have to remember where it is in your preset dial uh, it's just a simple lcd. It doesn't really give you a whole lot of information and even the th...

In fact, the whole point in supporting both the HD and the LL codecs is that there are different definitions of “the best” based on the application space. One usage model might value audio quality as the most important characteristic, but another might value low latency as the most important. If I’ve understood the B1’s protocol choice algorithm correctly, it’s an unfortunate design decision. All the modern high-quality transmitters which support AptX protocols whichI have looked at support both HD and LL, which means that the B1 can NEVER function as a low latency receiver

Oh it's. You know and uh, but it's still a great sounding synthesizer. So what i'm going to do now is i'm going to fast forward the tape and see if i ...